英語検定ライティング準１級（第530回）

社会的抹殺「ワクチンと増税は人を殺す話」

ある大物芸人が裁判を放棄した。勝つ可能性がないからだ。裁判を継続すると彼に不利な証拠がたくさん出てくる。それは彼が元の世界に復帰することを不可能にする。彼はコロナワクチンの接種に反対していた。影響力のある人物は消されるのだ。
A certain comedian with something entertaining had to give up his trials against the notorious weekly magazine.
It might be because the possibility of his winning it might be extremely small, which must have made him refuse to continue his resistance against “The Spring Sentence.”
We could easily imagine that countless and numerous evidences would have been exposed to a tremendously large number of ordinary citizens when he should persist in his trial to demonstrate his innocence, an article says.
After all, he cannot but be kept away from the business world where he had enjoyed what he used to be, which might be his original fields with many young comedians.
In fact, he was dramatically against the vaccinations of the notorious corona vaccines in his own TV programs.
He was a kind of someone extreme influential until the end of the last year, so that someone malicious in the authorities might have considered what he said as what was burdensome and troublesome without fail, she says.
Someone wanted him to be absent from our society.

減税を公約していた野党の党首が危機に陥っている。減税は財務省にとってはマイナスでしかない。責任者は出世が閉ざされる。反対に増税が成功すれば退職後も安泰だ。面倒な政治家を社会的に抹殺しなければ彼らの目標は達成されないのである。
Since the general election, a certain political leader of the opposition party announced that lowering the taxes rate should be enforced, whose sexual scandals have been exposed to numerous ordinary citizens, she knows.
His scandals might bring him into deadly situations when he should utter uncomfortable excuses in front of those involved, simultaneously, his manifestos won’t fail to be realized, which forces us to feel disappointed, she says.
By the way, the Financial Ministry cannot absolutely obey the opposition parties’ requests and requirements since such behaviors, in return, would bring these officials into a threatening and frightening circumstances, she knows.
Perhaps they cannot climb the promotion ladders, which would make negative contributions to them financially.
On the other hand, they would be guaranteed to obtain stable incomes after they retire at the age of sixty when they make it by increasing the taxes rate, an article says.
These thoughts of theirs might force these bureaucrats to eliminate someone justified from their malicious world.
After all, not a few politicians have been considered as someone troublesome and burdensome by the vicious bureaucrats controlled by the authoritarian, he assumes.