Can generative AI do aesthetics? This question can be rephrased as: Does generative AI have the conditions for aesthetics? At least humans are considered to have the conditions for aesthetics, since it was humans themselves who invented the concept of "aesthetics". On the contrary, is there an "aesthetics" that is beyond human comprehension? For example, is there an aesthetics for a generative AI or for a transcendent God that is beyond human comprehension? For humans and generative AI, or humans and God, to be able to understand each other's unique aesthetics, both must have a common sense. The world is made up of waves on one level, and the frequency range of sound and the bandwidth of visible light recognizable to humans is not equivalent to the range recognizable to other beings. Thus, there can be a resulting difference between the aesthetics inherent to humans and those inherent to other beings. By the same token, aesthetics for humans may not be the same as aesthetics for generative AI.
"Aesthetics" for ChatGPT
What is "aesthetics"? We would like to ask ChatGPT, a representative of generative AI, about it.
I asked ChatGPT first, "What is aesthetics?" and finally, "What is "aesthetics" for you?" The two questions are not similar. The first question asks about general knowledge of "aesthetics", while the last question asks about a particular "aesthetics" as seen from the viewpoint of a "generative AI = ChatGPT", for you. Aesthetics for generative AI is different from aesthetics for humans. If they both refer to the same situation, then there is no distinction between humans and generative AI. If generative AI can do aesthetics, we would expect it to produce different results from human aesthetics. However, the answers that humans expect from the generative AI by asking it questions are not the answers that the generative AI itself has thought up or that are useful to it. They are merely expressions of general trends based on large language model (LLM).
Can Generative AI Have a Fictive Person?
If generative AI can do aesthetics, then it may be necessary to admit one person to generative AI. However, it is not easy to grant a fictive person to generative AI. This is because the rights that can be exercised by generative AI as a person can only be assumed to be limited at best. For example, if generative AI were recognised as a person, could it be obliged to pay taxes as the head of the household, or would it be able to apply for health coverage to manage its own health risks? These matters may seem like silly ideas, but are they really not worth considering?