人気の記事一覧

③ Comparing the correct "prior art search" and the "search" conducted by the Patent Office.

This is the court's summary table regarding "Patent Infringement Injunction Cases".

The plaintiff's claim was dismissed (Plaintiff=X: Hiroshi Murakami's rights are invalid). This is the 363rd update in which the Intellectual Property High Court has declared the rights invalid.

WORLD IP DAY STATEMENT, Intellectual Property Remains a Critical Challenge in the U.S.-China Relationship, U.S. Embassy & Consulate in China, Apr. 29, 2024.

This is the divisional application information for the 363rd updated patent 6271790 (cancelled due to the finalization of an invalidation trial).

⑤ It is about the correct "prior art search" and comparison with the "search" conducted by the Patent Office -2.

④ Comparison between correct "Prior Art Search" and "Search" conducted by the Patent Office (Summary).

工藤雪枝の私的な知的財産権法の判断

The plaintiff's claim was dismissed (Plaintiff = Sapporo Holdings' rights invalid). This is the 331st case in which the Intellectual Property High Court has ruled a right invalid.

13時間前

The original judgment is set aside. The appellee's claim is dismissed (appellee = Mutsu Electric Appliances Co., Ltd.'s rights are invalid). This is the 330th case.

The decision was annulled (the rights of the plaintiff, Nippon Kyodo Kikaku, were invalid). This is the 327th case to be declared "invalid" by the Intellectual Property High Court.

Dismissal of the plaintiff's claim (Plaintiff = Tanita's rights invalid).

⑦ This is about the strange and mystery of "FI" and "F-term" assignments, as well as questions about "examiner-free words"

⑥It is about "classifying" the applied patent.

The plaintiff's claim was dismissed (the plaintiff's rights are invalid). This is the 328th case in which the Intellectual Property High Court has dismissed the plaintiff's claim and found the rights invalid.

The plaintiff's claim was dismissed (Plaintiff = E.K.C. Technology Inc.'s rights invalid). This is the 325th case to be declared "invalid" by the Intellectual Property High Court.

The plaintiff's claim was dismissed (Plaintiff = X: Murakami Hiroshi's rights invalid). This is the 363rd updated case in which the Intellectual Property High Court has ruled a right invalid, and this is one related to an invalidation trial.