Craig Wright Vs.trial status❶ (an English version)

In past history, all cutting-edge technology was developed by the most advanced technology.

Historically, companies have been acquired. But IT"s　Time is Differ88８
If the circumstances are different or an acquisition is made, the technology and its technology.

The identity and patent of the creator of the product must be recognized in court.

Let's take that into account as well.

Perhaps COPA wants to buy Dr. Craig Wright and his scaling patents.

If Google acquires his entire nChain, if BSV is not acquired

The court must first clarify the identity of the creator of the cutting-edge technology. That's what this trial is about

In any case, BSV's direction is not wrong. This is not your last chance as it will be evaluated over the long term.

Chromium開発者がマイクロペイメント用のブラウザAPIに取り組んでいる |TechSpot(テックスポット)

Dr. Craig's side seems to have submitted a large amount of ``conclusive evidence.''

LaTex isn't the only proof

This trial, the skill of the judge and the courtroom
will be verified with

It will not be disclosed to COPA side. If it existed

Dr. Craig's side will win, right?

---

Regarding this, I am reading information from Mr. Shishido

※Mr. Shishido is BSV's official Japanese ambassador

What caught my attention as I was reading Mr. Shishido's information was the part about the 6th day.

https://note.com/kenshishido/n/n38f367717297

Dr. Craig started mining Bitcoin's Genesis block on the 69 Lac system.

COPA doesn't seem to be against it.

 Who pressed the confirm button to start Bitcoin?

Who created the genesis block during the first Bitcoin mining?
(The first round of Bitcoin blockchain mining, which has continued non-stop for over 10 years at 10 minute intervals to date)

I believe Dr. Craig is the only person who knows detailed information about the Genesis Block.

You should approach Bitcoin information with this in mind.

*When I, youiti2nz, first started BSV, I stayed up all night looking for information on Bitcoin, and I feel that the information I got was correct.

When I heard about Mr. Shishido's meeting space at X yesterday, I thought this was it.

The cryptographic watermark (steganography) hidden in the Latex Bitcoin white paper can be verified with software called SNOW, and the Bitcoin Genesis block also contains the same watermark and is said to be linked.

Dr. Craig says it exists, apparently.

If that evidence is verified, it will be confirmed that Craig is Satoshi

At the very least, mainstream media will no longer be able to provide biased reporting.

Representing BTC as Bitcoin may also be legally prohibited.

*Current court articles are extremely biased towards COPA and are one-sided.
For example (wired.jp) COPA trial article

It would be unfair if there were no articles biased towards Dr. Craig's side.
That's why I'm writing this on youiti2nz BSV blog.

*If the encrypted and hidden message matches, for example, "My name is Craig Wright, aka Satoshi Nakamoto" and can actually be verified using software called SNOW, COPA will detect that fact. . . (This part is my personal guess and speculation)

But above all, the fact that Dr. Craig is extremely knowledgeable is already clear evidence.

It's unclear whether that evidence will ever be made public, but if a judge considers it and approves it, Craig has a good chance of winning the case. This is evidence that cannot be removed and cannot be changed or tampered with later due to time constraints.

It seems that a lot of undisclosed conclusive evidence has been submitted, but regarding undisclosed evidence,
The court will decide, but COPA cannot sue

あの曲しな　P2Pでマイクロ価格ついっとりゃさえしときゅあ
安心安全に落とせる、せてたっ。ねんで