マイノリティが意外と保守的だった件（アメリカ大統領選）

何度か、カマラ・ハリス氏が大統領選でドナルド・トランプ氏に敗北した件を書いてきた。ハリス氏は、ポリティカルコレクトネスにこだわり、経済問題を正面から論じることが少なかった。これが敗因だろう。

他にも敗因はある。アメリカのマイノリティには、黒人、ヒスパニックなどがいる。そして、ヒスパニックはカトリック教徒が多い。ヒスパニックの故郷であるメキシコは、スペインの影響が残るため、カトリック教徒が多いのだ。そして、カトリック教徒は、プロテスタントよりも保守的である。

アメリカでは、ポリティカルコレクトネス疲れがある。そのため、ハリス氏が真面目にポリコレ的な発言をするたびに、カトリック教徒はウンザリしていた可能性がある。

他にも、毎年秋に開催される、カトリック教徒のコントまじりの晩餐会のイベントを、ハリス氏は欠席した。ちなみに、トランプ氏はちゃんと出席した。これがかなり、カトリック教徒を怒らせたと言われている。

ハリス氏は真面目だが、カトリック教徒も含めて、多くの人に親しまれる努力を怠った。まあ、悪い言い方をすれば、クラスの真面目でうるさい生徒会長になってしまったのだ。風紀委員でも良いだろう。

他にも、イスラム教徒（アラブ系）の人も保守的だ。同性婚などには賛成したくなかったと思われる。

民主党は、ポリコレよりも、経済や国民生活を重視するべきだろう。

Here's an essay that encompasses the topics we've discussed, including the Al Smith Dinner, the political dynamics between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, and the cultural aspects of American political events.

---

## The Al Smith Dinner: A Reflection of American Political Culture

The Al Smith Dinner is a longstanding tradition in American politics, serving as a unique intersection of faith, charity, and political satire. Hosted by the Catholic Church, this annual event has become a hallmark of the election cycle, particularly in presidential election years. It provides a platform where political adversaries can share the stage and engage in light-hearted banter, showcasing a side of politics that is often overshadowed by the rigors of campaigning.

### A Historical Perspective

Since its inception in 1945, the Al Smith Dinner has been a venue where presidential candidates deliver speeches laced with humor and self-deprecation. The event is named after Alfred E. Smith, the first Catholic nominee for President of the United States. It aims to raise funds for Catholic charities while promoting dialogue and understanding across political divides.

### The 2024 Election Cycle

In the 2024 election cycle, the Al Smith Dinner once again played a significant role. Former President Donald Trump attended and delivered a speech filled with his characteristic wit and sharp humor. Known for his bold and often controversial remarks, Trump used this opportunity to jest about his opponents, including Kamala Harris and Chuck Schumer. His approach to humor at such events reflects a broader American cultural trait: the ability to laugh at oneself and one's adversaries.

Kamala Harris, however, chose not to attend in person this year. Instead, she sent a prerecorded message—a move reminiscent of Walter Mondale's absence in 1984. Her decision highlights a shift in how candidates engage with traditional events amid changing political climates and personal strategies.

### Cultural Significance

The Al Smith Dinner exemplifies an aspect of American political culture that values humor as a tool for connection and relief from the intensity of electoral battles. It allows candidates to humanize themselves before voters and demonstrate resilience in the face of criticism. However, it also underscores the delicate balance candidates must maintain between humor and decorum.

In 2016, Trump's remarks at the dinner were criticized for crossing lines of decorum, illustrating that even in settings designed for levity, there are boundaries that should not be overstepped. This incident serves as a reminder of the evolving nature of political discourse in America.

### Conclusion

The Al Smith Dinner remains a testament to the unique blend of politics and culture in America. It offers a rare moment where adversaries can share laughter amidst their rivalry, reflecting both the strengths and challenges of political engagement in a diverse society. As candidates like Donald Trump and Kamala Harris navigate these traditions, they also shape how future generations will perceive and participate in such events.

In essence, while political dynamics continue to evolve, events like the Al Smith Dinner remind us that humor can be a powerful bridge across divides—if wielded with care and respect.

---

This essay captures the essence of our discussion on the Al Smith Dinner and its role within American political culture during election years.