ðºðžãã©ã³ã倧統é ã®å£°æâŒïž
ðšãŠã©ãŒã«ã¹ããªãŒããžã£ãŒãã«ã¯çœå¡ãã®å£°æãåºããã°ããã§ãäœå¹Žãã®éç±³åœãé£ãç©ã«ããŠããïŒãã£ã€ããŠã€ã«ã¹ã®çœå®³ããå«ãŸãªãïŒäžåœã«å¯Ÿããé¢çšã«é¢ãã圌ãã®èŠè§£ãšã»ãŒåããããééã£ãŠããããã³ã·ã«ããã¢å·ã§ã®éžæã®è©æ¬ºãæ£åœåããããšããŠãããããããšããç§ãã¡ãæ£ãããšèšã£ãŠããããã©ã³ãã¯åå©ã«è³ããªã2ã€ã®å·ã«ãªãã§ããããã
ééãïŒç§ãã¡ã¯ãã³ã·ã«ããã¢ã«ã€ããŠè©±ããŠããã ãã§ã倧èŠæš¡ãªè©æ¬ºãéžæã®äžæ£ã«å·»ã蟌ãŸããŠããä»ã®å·ã«ã€ããŠã¯è©±ããŠããŸããã§ãããäŸãšããŠããŠã£ã¹ã³ã³ã·ã³å·ã©ã·ãŒã³ã§æšæ¥èµ·ãã£ãããšãèŠãŠã¿ãŸãããããŠã£ã¹ã³ã³ã·ã³å·éžæå§å¡äŒãåœãããåæ¢ãªæåœè ä¿å®å®ãšåœŒã®ã¹ã¿ããããé€è·æœèšã§ã®æ祚çšçŽã®åç©«ããã®ä»ã®äºæã«é¢ããŠè©æ¬ºãç¯çœªè¡çºãçºèŠããŸãããå·å šäœã§è¡ãããã¹ãã§ããããã¯æ°·å±±ã®äžè§ã«ãããŸããã
ãŠã£ã¹ã³ã³ã·ã³å·ã«ã¯ãæ祚è IDã瀺ããªãå°ãªããšã44,272ã®éæ³ãªãç¡æéã«å¶éããããæ祚ãç¹å®ããç«æ³ç£æ»å±ããã®æ°ããå ±åã«ãããšãéåããå€æ°ã®æ³åŸãå«ããä»ã®å€ãã®äžæ£ããããŸããéµéæ祚çšçŽã®ãµã³ãã«ã®ã»ãŒ7ïŒ ã¯ãæ³åŸã§çŸ©åä»ããããŠããæ å ±ãæ¬ èœããŠãããããã«ãŠã³ããã¹ãã§ã¯ãããŸããã§ãããããã¯ã32,431ã®éæ³æ祚çšçŽã«çžåœããŸãã
Facebookãè³éæäŸããããããããã¯ã¹ããã®43,907祚ãCoCèŠä»¶ã«éåããéæ³ã«ã«ãŠã³ããããããããžã§ãŒãžã¢å·ã§ã®è©æ¬ºã®äžäŸïŒãããŠãã£ãšãããããããŸãïŒïŒã§éžæãæºãããã®ã«ååã§ããïŒãã·ã¬ã³å·ã§ã¯ãå·è°äŒã®RINOã§ããã11æ4æ¥ã®åå3æ30åãšåå4æ30åã«ãçŽ45,000祚ãCoCãªãã§ãããã€ãã®TCFã»ã³ã¿ãŒã«é éãããæšå®289,866祚ã®äžåšè æ祚ãéæ³ã«éãããããšã確èªããŸãããããããèŠæ±ããããšããªã人ã ã«ãå·ãåã¡åãããã«å¿ èŠãªããã¯ããã«å€ãã®ç¥šã
ãŸãã¢ãªãŸãå·ã§ã¯ãããªã³ãé¡ã®ç£ç£å§å¡äŒãç£æ»ã«é¢ãããå®å šãªåããåºããå¬åç¶ãç¡èŠããŠéžæããŒã¿ãšèšé²ãéæ³ã«åé€ããŠããã®ãçºèŠãããŸããã圌ãã¯ã以äžãå«ãã¢ãªãŸãç£æ»ã®çµæã説æããããšã¯ã§ããŸããã
â23,344人ã®ã以åã®äœæããæ祚ãããéµéæ祚çšçŽã
â9,041ãæ祚è
ãåãåã£ããããå€ãã®æ祚çšçŽãè¿ãããŸããã
â284,412æã®æ祚çšçŽã®ç»åããç ŽæãŸãã¯æ¬ èœããŠããã
â17,322æã®éè€æ祚çšçŽïŒéžææ¥åŸã«æ¥å¢ïŒ
â5,295人ã®ãè€æ°ã®é¡ã§æ祚ããå¯èœæ§ã®ããæ祚è
ã
â2,382人ã®ãããªã³ãé¡ããåŒã£è¶ãã察é¢ææš©è
ã
â2,081人ãéžæåã®29æ¥éã«æ祚è
ãå·å€ã«ç§»åããã
âãå
¬åŒçµæãæ祚è
ãšäžèŽããªããïŒå°ãªããšã3,432祚ã®å·®ïŒ
ð¯ðµæ¥æ¬èªç¿»èš³ã¢ããªäœ¿çšðž
The Wall Street Journal just did a white-washed statement, so incorrectly, almost as incorrect as their views on tariffs against China, a country that has been ripping off the United States for years (not even including the disaster of the China Virus), trying to justify the fraud of an election in Pennsylvania, but also saying âeven ifâ we are right, âMr. Trump would be two states short of victory.â
Wrong! We were only talking about Pennsylvania, we werenât talking about other states, which are also wrapped up in large scale fraud or election improprieties. As an example take a look at what happened yesterday in Racine, Wisconsin, where a brave Patriot Sheriff and his staff found fraud and criminal activity with regard to what took place with ballot harvesting and other things in nursing homes, which the Wisconsin Election Commission ordered to be done throughout the state. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
There are many other improprieties in Wisconsin, including numerous laws broken, according to a new report from the Legislative Audit Bureau, who identified at least 44,272 illegal âindefinitely confinedâ votes who did not show Voter ID. Almost 7% of a sample of mail-in ballots were missing information required by law, and therefore should not have counted, which would amount to 32,431 illegal ballots.
Just one example of fraud in Georgia (and there is so much more!) is enough to swing the election, as 43,907 ballots from Facebook funded drop boxes violated Chain of Custody requirements, and were thus illegally counted? In Michigan, even the RINOs in the state senate confirmed roughly 45,000 ballots were delivered to the TCF Center in Detroit with no Chain of Custody at 3:30 and 4:30 a.m on Nov. 4, and an estimated 289,866 absentee ballots were illegally sent to people who never requested them, far more votes than needed to win the state.
Also in Arizona, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors were caught spreading âoutright liesâ about the Audit, and caught illegally deleting election data and records in defiance of a subpoena. They cannot explain away the findings of the Arizona Audit, which include:
â 23,344 âMail-In Ballots Voted from Prior Addressâ
â 9,041 âMore Ballots Returned by Voter Than Receivedâ
â 284,412 ballot images âwere corrupt or missingâ
â 17,322 duplicate ballot envelopes (which surged after Election Day)
â 5,295 âVoters That Potentially Voted in Multiple Countiesâ
â 2,382 âIn-Person Voters Who Had Moved out of Maricopa Countyâ
â 2,081 âVoters Moved Out-of-State During 29-Day Period Preceding Electionâ
â âOfficial Results Does Not Match Who Votedâ (off by at least 3,432 ballots)