2024年2月

2024年2月20日 23:51

(February 20, 2024)What role should virtual currencies play in our world?

[my own answer]
One originally expected role of virtual currencies is to make money transfers easier and more flexible. Even now, shipping money to others, especially across the globe, is said to have some difficulty and often it costs much more than giving it to neighbors in cash. Virtual currencies are initially designed as they can be trusted for sending remotely without much cost, which can encourage small business owners to enhance their business more smoothly.

[ChatGPT answer]
Virtual currencies should serve as complementary tools in our world, offering alternatives to traditional financial systems. They can foster financial inclusion, enabling access to banking services for the unbanked population. Additionally, virtual currencies promote innovation in payment systems and offer greater security and transparency. However, regulatory frameworks must ensure consumer protection and mitigate risks such as volatility and illicit activities. Ultimately, the role of virtual currencies should be to enhance financial accessibility, efficiency, and inclusivity while ensuring regulatory oversight and stability.

[vocabulary]
unbanked 銀行口座を持たない
illicit 違法な
regulatory oversight 規制監督

(February 21, 2024)Does AI(Artificial Intelligence) have a responsibility to help unemployment in society?

[my own answer]
As Artificial Intelligence has got a more influence on society, it is often argued that AI should have a responsibility to help unemployment, which might be based on a projection AI can steal various jobs from human. I disagree with this opinion, considering two reasons. One is that losing one's job due to be alternated by AI should owe to his/her own efforts and thoughts basically. AI is just one of human's tools to enrich our lives and efficiency in doing everything, which should be managed and controlled by human. Therefore, it seems to be strange that AI is responsible for overcoming increasing unemployment. Another reason is unemployment might not be a problem owing to AI's positive effects on enhancing our working efficiency. If AI gets so more robust and reliable in working significantly as to alternate human, we get required not to work as hard as we are doing now. Therefore, it might not be necessary for AI to help reduce unemployment rate accordingly. In conclusion, AI should not contribute to decrease unemployment in society since it should be owned to by human itself and furthermore it might not need to cope with unemployment due to the alternation of our work by AI in the future.

[ChatGPT answer]
AI does bear a responsibility to address unemployment in society. While AI may displace certain jobs, it also creates new opportunities and enhances productivity in various sectors. AI-driven solutions can streamline processes, foster innovation, and stimulate economic growth, ultimately generating new job prospects. Moreover, AI can assist in upskilling and reskilling workers to adapt to evolving industries. However, ethical considerations must guide AI development to ensure equitable access to employment opportunities and mitigate potential socioeconomic disparities. Ultimately, AI should be leveraged responsibly to mitigate unemployment while promoting inclusive economic advancement.

[vocabulary]
streamline 合理化する

(February 22, 2024)Are old Japanese temples worth preserving?

[my own answer]
I can understand the fact that Japan has a lot of traditional temples worth being remained in the future from the viewpoint of culture, education, and tourism. However, it should be argued which temples are to be prioritized. One reason to be highlighted first is the cost to fix and maintain aged temples. And the another reason is shortage of human resources to keep them up. Both factors get more and more limited in coming decades in Japan, which should cause Japanese and its local governments more difficulties in retaining the values of existence of temples. Standing on this vulnerable situation, it seems to be evaluated and selected carefully which temples are worth remained based on their values, which are fostered by such as, historical and cultural rareness, educational opportunities, and fascinating sites for sightseeing. In conclusion, Preserving temples which have these valuable aspects should foster Japanese interest and enrich Japan's attractiveness in the future.

[ChatGPT answer]
Old Japanese temples hold immense cultural, historical, and spiritual significance, making their preservation essential. These temples serve as tangible links to Japan's rich heritage, offering insights into ancient architectural techniques, religious practices, and artistic traditions. Furthermore, they attract tourists, contributing to local economies and fostering appreciation for Japan's cultural identity. Preserving these temples not only honors the past but also ensures their continued role as centers of community engagement and spiritual reflection. Therefore, safeguarding old Japanese temples is crucial for maintaining cultural heritage and promoting cultural exchange.

(February 23, 2024)Should subordinate workers be asked to evaluate their supervisors?

[my own answer]
In my opinion, subordinate workers should have chances to evaluate their supervisors. If not, the relationship between these two roles should be one sided, under which conditions inequality transpires and the supervisors tend to be reactant to take care of their own behavior against their subordinates. Furthermore, the evaluation to supervisors can create a positive circumstance across their workplace, where all the members feel free to raise their own opinion, which enables the company to be more open and foster a preferable culture for employees to exchange creativity enthusiastically. However, evaluation process should be so carefully treated as to keep the subordinate member from being identified by his/her supervisor. The evaluator being revealed to their supervisor, it can cause a negative impact on their relationship on business, which should be a tragedy to be avoided.

(February 24, 2024)Agree or disagree: The death penalty should be banned in Japan

[my own answer after fixed by Grammarly]
It is occasionally argued that the death penalty has played an important role in maintaining a highly safe society in Japan. However, I disagree with this opinion from a few viewpoints of risks it has. Firstly, the death penalty can prevent a man who committed a crime from getting back into society. This stands on a fundamental theory that none of the people is born as a criminal, which ensures any atrocious criminals can regret their crimes and restructure their thoughts to be able to live in society normally. But, once they are killed under laws, they never come back. Secondly, there are a lot of cases where a judgment in a court was incorrect, which means even a well-experienced judge can make a wrong decision. The death penalty unconsciously removes the possibility of finding any mistakes made in the process of investigations and judgments. Furthermore, there is no munificent evidence that proves the effectiveness of the death penalty in hindering people from committing crimes, which has been discussed in recent research.
In conclusion, the death penalty should not be allowed due to some risks which can prevent a criminal from recovering himself into society, keep a malfunction of a judgment from being found, and it cannot contribute to mitigating a high criminal ratio in society.

[ChatGTP model answer]
The death penalty remains a contentious issue worldwide, and Japan is no exception. Advocates argue that it serves as a deterrent for serious crimes and provides justice for victims and their families. However, opponents highlight concerns about wrongful convictions, lack of rehabilitation opportunities, and ethical implications.

In Japan, the death penalty persists despite international criticism. Supporters believe it upholds societal values and provides closure for victims' families. Yet, Japan's secretive execution process and limited appeals raise questions about transparency and due process.

Banning the death penalty in Japan would align with global trends towards abolition and emphasize respect for human rights. Alternatives like life imprisonment offer opportunities for rehabilitation and reconciliation while safeguarding against irreversible mistakes. Additionally, abolishing capital punishment could enhance Japan's reputation on the international stage and promote a more humane justice system.

In conclusion, while the death penalty has proponents who argue for its necessity, the moral and practical considerations warrant its abolition in Japan. Embracing alternative forms of punishment would signify a commitment to justice, compassion, and respect for human dignity.

死刑制度に対する主な反対理由
・更生する可能性を奪うから（人は生まれながらにして犯罪者ではない）
・死刑制度や執行が社会の犯罪抑止に有効ではないという研究成果があるから
・冤罪の可能性が否定できないから

(February 25, 2024)Can the death penalty be morally justified?

[My own answer after fixed by Grammarly]
Although it is often argued that the death penalty can be a crime deterrent, it should not be allowed from the perspective of human dignity. A criminal is also a human, who was not a criminal originally and who has, of course, human rights as well as one who does not commit a crime. However, capital punishment forcibly removes the right to live from an inmate under laws, which are created by humans, which raises questions about its justice. Furthermore, there is more morally alternative punishment, such as life imprisonment, which can embrace ethical implications, preventing from lack of rehabilitation opportunities.
It is concluded that killing people under laws cannot be warranted, considering preserving the fundamental rights of a criminal and its involuntary atrociousness. Implementing more reasonable processes to mitigate the occurrence of crime while retaining human dignity can realize a society where people can live with proper human rights.

[chatGPT model answer]
The moral justification of the death penalty remains a deeply contentious issue, with arguments both for and against its implementation. Proponents often cite notions of retribution, deterrence, and justice as grounds for its use. They argue that certain heinous crimes warrant the ultimate punishment, providing a sense of closure for victims and society. Moreover, they contend that the death penalty serves as a deterrent against future crimes of a similar nature.
On the other hand, opponents challenge the moral basis of the death penalty, highlighting concerns about its irreversibility, potential for wrongful convictions, and violation of human rights. They argue that state-sanctioned killing undermines the sanctity of life and fails to address the root causes of crime effectively. Additionally, disparities in its application, such as racial and socioeconomic factors, raise questions about fairness and equity within the justice system.
Ultimately, the moral justification of the death penalty hinges on individual perspectives and values. While some may view it as a necessary tool for justice, others advocate for its abolition in favor of more humane and restorative approaches to punishment. The ongoing debate underscores the complexity of ethical considerations surrounding capital punishment.

memo
・死刑制度は犯罪の抑止力として働くため存続すべきという意見がある。
・しかし、犯罪者も一人の人間であり、生まれながらにして犯罪者ではない。
・法の下に人間の命を奪うことは人間の尊厳を害する行為であるため、モラルの観点から許されない。
・死刑に代わる、更生に向けて効果のある刑罰を導入することもできる。

(February 26, 2024)Is modern business too dependent on Information Technology?

[my own answer after fixed by Grammarly]
I don't believe modern business is excessively dependent on information technology based on a few perspectives as follows.
First of all, it cannot be doubted that embracing various information technologies has dramatically boosted our business productivity, which is, for instance, exemplified by utilizing email in business. Today, we cannot imagine undergoing daily business activities without using emails to communicate with each other, though, it is a fact that it took at least one day to send documents to stakeholders before the emergence of email technology, which should prove its usefulness to our business.
Second, information technology can reduce our simple work, repeatedly executed, and with no space for improvement, which enables us to spend our limited time contributing to jobs, which require creativity more. These days, robotic process automation(RPA) helps us cut down our time to input many data into formatted documents, creating more time to drive our discussion in future exciting business plans with colleagues.
Finally, we can mitigate the risks of letting our mental conditions or individual bias intervene in crucial judgment on business by harnessing data-driven management. If information technology can provide us with automatically calculated results from the facts as accumulated previous data, it can be realized to make a decision without precarious conditions made by human thoughts, which can also contribute to a decrease in time spent discussing and considering which should be better.
In conclusion, information technology is essential for today's business to be more productive, harnessing useful tools, altering our manual operations to automated processes, and embracing data-driven management processes for more sophisticated judgment.

[chatGPT model answer]
Modern businesses are undeniably reliant on Information Technology (IT) to streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and stay competitive. However, this dependence raises concerns about overreliance and potential vulnerabilities. Firstly, cyber threats pose significant risks to businesses heavily invested in IT. With increasing digitization, the likelihood of cyberattacks, data breaches, and ransomware incidents rises, threatening sensitive information and disrupting operations.
Secondly, reliance on IT can lead to a lack of resilience in the face of technological failures or disruptions. Any malfunction or outage in critical systems could cripple business functions, leading to significant downtime and financial losses. Moreover, as businesses become more interconnected through IT networks, they become susceptible to cascading failures and systemic risks.
Thirdly, overdependence on IT may stifle innovation and creativity within organizations. Relying solely on existing technology solutions may limit exploration of alternative approaches or hinder adaptation to evolving market demands. This inertia can hinder business agility and inhibit the ability to capitalize on emerging opportunities.
In conclusion, while IT offers numerous benefits to modern businesses, excessive dependence carries inherent risks. Striking a balance between leveraging technology and maintaining resilience is crucial for ensuring sustainable business success in today's digital landscape.

memo
・繰り返し実行する必要のある単調で工夫の余地のない作業を情報技術により処理することで、人間はより創造性の求められる仕事に時間を費やすことができる。
・人間の判断にはその時々の精神的な調子や偏見を含んでしまい常に合理的な論拠に基づかない。情報技術を利用することでより合理的なビジネス判断を下すことが可能になる。
・情報技術の進化は目覚ましく、これまで私たちは様々な技術革新によりビジネス上の利便性を得ることができた。