英検準1級意見論述問題の練習問題を定期的にUPするページです（毎週月曜更新）
医塾講師の島田です。
（島田先生 | 医塾｜受験の専門医によるオンライン個別指導塾）
生徒さんに解かせる英検準１級意見論述問題の練習問題をUPするスペースとして、こちらのノートに書きますね。
もし問題が足りない人がいればご自由に使ってください。
No.1
TOPIC
Agree or disagree: Should schools introduce more online learning?
POINTS
Access
Engagement
Technology
Interaction
No.2
TOPIC
Should governments invest more in public transportation?
POINTS
Environment
Convenience
Cost
Crime
No.3
TOPIC
Agree or disagree: Is social media harmful to society?
POINTS
Election
Mental health
Misinformation
Communication
2023年3回過去問
TOPIC
Should the government do more to encourage young people to vote in elections?
POINTS
・Freedom of choice
・Social responsibility
・Taxes
・Trust in politicians
2024年1回過去問
TOPIC
In urban areas, should the government encourage vacant land to be used for farming?
POINTS
・Costs
・Pollution
・Population
・Technology
2024年2回過去問
TOPIC
Should a high salary be the most important thing when searching for a job?
POINTS
・Career opportunities
・Quality of life
・Social responsibility
・Workplace environment
2024年3回英検準1級意見論述予想問題10問
1. Should schools implement mandatory digital literacy courses for all students?
Points: Job skills, Cybersecurity, Access to information, Education costs
2. Is it necessary for governments to impose stricter regulations on social media platforms?
Points: Freedom of speech, Mental health, Privacy, Misinformation
3. Should companies be required to offer remote work options to employees?
Points: Productivity, Work-life balance, Environmental impact, Job satisfaction
4. Should governments provide free public transportation in large cities?
Points: Costs, Environmental benefits, Accessibility, Traffic congestion
5. Should advertising aimed at children be restricted by law?
Points: Consumer habits, Health, Freedom of choice, Corporate responsibility
6. Is it essential for high schools to teach financial literacy as a core subject?
Points: Life skills, Economic stability, Curriculum limitations, Parental role
7. Should countries allocate more resources to space exploration?
Points: National security, Scientific research, Costs, Environmental concerns on Earth
8. Should animal testing be banned in the development of consumer products?
Points: Ethics, Safety, Scientific advancement, Alternatives
9. Is it important for countries to prioritize the development of renewable energy sources?
Points: Environmental impact, Economic costs, Energy security, Technological challenges
10. Should the government provide more support for small businesses over large corporations?
Points: Economic diversity, Employment, Innovation, Tax revenue
No.2の問題を島田が書いた答えと、それを島田作成の添削AIで添削した結果
No.2
TOPIC
Should governments invest more in public transportation?
POINTS
Environment
Convenience
Cost
Crime
島田の解答 （205 words）
EnvironmentとConvenienceを使いました。C1レベルの英語で書きました。（準１級満点、IELTS7.0レベルの答案）
※参考までに訳もつけています。
I firmly believe that increased investment is essential, primarily due to its positive impact on the environment and the convenience it provides to citizens.
私は、公共交通機関への投資の増加が不可欠であると強く信じています。主に、その投資が環境に与える肯定的な影響と、市民に提供する利便性のためです。
Firstly, enhancing public transportation can play a significant role in reducing pollution. With fewer private vehicles on the road, harmful emissions decrease, contributing to better air quality and combating climate change. Countries that have prioritized public transit have seen a reduction in greenhouse gases, supporting the global effort toward sustainability. Therefore, governments investing in public transportation align with environmental goals and benefit public health.
まず、公共交通機関の強化は、汚染の削減に大きく寄与することができます。私的な車両の数が減ることで、有害な排出物が減少し、大気の質が改善され、気候変動の対策にもなります。公共交通を優先している国々は温室効果ガスの削減を達成しており、持続可能性に向けた地球規模の取り組みを支援しています。そのため、政府が公共交通機関に投資することは、環境目標に合致し、公共の健康にも利益をもたらします。
Secondly, improved public transport systems provide undeniable convenience for commuters. In cities where buses, trains, and subways are frequent and reliable, citizens experience shorter travel times and reduced stress. Furthermore, accessible public transportation eases traffic congestion, allowing people to move quickly and efficiently. A well-developed system supports economic growth as it facilitates easy movement within urban areas, making it a convenient option for many.
次に、公共交通システムの改善は、通勤者にとって否定できない利便性を提供します。バスや電車、地下鉄が頻繁かつ信頼性がある都市では、市民は移動時間の短縮とストレスの軽減を体験します。さらに、アクセスしやすい公共交通機関は交通渋滞を緩和し、人々が迅速かつ効率的に移動できるようにします。発達したシステムは都市部での円滑な移動を促進し、多くの人々にとって利便性の高い選択肢となります。
In conclusion, the advantages of investing in public transportation extend beyond just the individual; they impact society as a whole. Prioritizing environmental sustainability and enhancing convenience for citizens justify substantial government funding. As more cities embrace public transit improvements, the benefits will ripple through future generations, fostering a more sustainable and accessible world.
結論として、公共交通機関への投資の利点は、個人にとどまらず、社会全体に影響を及ぼします。環境の持続可能性を優先し、市民の利便性を向上させることは、政府による十分な資金投入を正当化します。より多くの都市が公共交通の改善を採用するにつれて、その利益は将来の世代にも波及し、より持続可能でアクセスしやすい世界を築くことができます。
採点結果
構成: 4/4
段落ごとに明確な主張とサポートがあり、論理の流れも自然です。序論で立場を示し、各ボディ段落でポイントを詳述し、結論で全体をまとめているため、理想的な構成です。内容: 4/4
環境への影響と利便性について具体的な理由と事例が含まれており、問題文に示されたポイントに適切に応答しています。特に環境保護や市民の利便性を軸にして、投資の意義を強調しているため、内容が充実しています。文法: 4/4
文法ミスがなく、多様な文構造が使われているため、文法的に非常に優れた回答です。語彙: 4/4
「greenhouse gases」「sustainability」「traffic congestion」など適切な語彙が使用され、語彙力の高さが示されています。また、全体的に表現が自然で、伝えたい意図が的確に伝わります。
総合得点: 16/16
今回の回答には、文法や表記上の修正が不要でした。
島田が書き直した英文
I firmly believe that increased government investment in public transportation is essential, primarily because of its positive impact on the environment and the convenience it provides to citizens.
To begin with, enhancing public transportation can play a crucial role in reducing pollution. By decreasing the number of private vehicles on the road, harmful emissions drop, leading to better air quality and helping to combat climate change. Nations that have prioritized public transit have observed a reduction in greenhouse gases, thus contributing to global sustainability efforts. Therefore, government funding for public transportation aligns with environmental objectives and supports public health.
In addition, improved public transport systems offer undeniable convenience for commuters. In cities where buses, trains, and subways operate frequently and reliably, people experience shorter travel times and less stress. Moreover, accessible public transportation alleviates traffic congestion, allowing citizens to travel quickly and efficiently. A robust public transport system supports economic growth by facilitating movement within urban areas, making it a convenient choice for many.
In conclusion, the benefits of investing in public transportation extend beyond individual convenience, positively impacting society as a whole. Prioritizing environmental sustainability and providing citizens with greater convenience justify substantial government spending. As more cities embrace public transit improvements, the resulting advantages will ripple through future generations, fostering a more sustainable and accessible world.
4で修正した箇所
a. "government funding"の表現を "substantial government spending"に変更しました。この表現により、政府の予算投入の意味が明確に強調されています。
b. "improved public transport systems"から"improved"の代わりに"robust"を使用し、インフラの質的向上のニュアンスを強調しました。
c. "people" を "citizens" に置き換え、対象が明確になるよう調整しました。
コメント
今回のエッセイは、構成が非常に明確で、具体的な事例や理由も十分に説明されており、説得力のある内容に仕上がっています。文法や語彙も正確で、洗練された表現が随所に見られました。特に「環境」と「利便性」という2つの観点から一貫性を持って主張を展開できている点が素晴らしいです。今後もこの調子で、さらに多様な表現に挑戦してみてください。
No.10の問題を島田が書いた答え(満点解答)
Topic
Should the government provide more support for small businesses over large corporations?
Points
・Economic diversity
・Employment
・Innovation
・Tax revenue
島田の解答
The government should provide more support for small businesses over large corporations because they promote economic diversity and create employment opportunities. Prioritizing small businesses strengthens the economy and benefits society as a whole.
First, small businesses contribute to economic diversity. Unlike large corporations that dominate markets, small businesses offer unique products and services, enriching local economies. This diversity makes the economy more resilient to disruptions. For example, during economic downturns, diverse small businesses can sustain local markets and prevent over-reliance on a few large corporations. By supporting small businesses, governments can ensure a more balanced and adaptable economic system.
Second, small businesses are essential for creating jobs. They often hire locally and provide opportunities to people who might not find work in larger companies. Moreover, small businesses are less likely to outsource or automate jobs compared to large corporations. By offering grants, low-interest loans, and tax incentives, governments can help small businesses grow, thereby reducing unemployment and improving community well-being.
In conclusion, supporting small businesses over large corporations fosters economic diversity and increases employment. These benefits outweigh the advantages of prioritizing large corporations, making it a wise policy choice for sustainable economic growth.
どのように書いたか知りたい方は、医塾の島田までお問い合わせください。難しいことはなく仕組みがわかれば誰でも書けます！
今後も毎週月曜に更新予定