"Complete version science novel The identity of thermodynamic entropy" Chapter 1 Hiromatsun Koichi Matsuo

Two years have passed since I published the first edition of this work.

 So, I decided to reread this work again, but it still contained some incomplete content, so I wanted to reproduce it in a more complete form, so I decided to read it again. I would like to rewrite the work, and I have reached today.

 Also, since some of the content itself is now outdated, I would like to recreate it in a form that is closer to the current content.

 And I would like to add more interesting content to the readers of this work so far, and present a new work, "Complete version: The identity of thermodynamic entropy". .

 From the author, Koichi Matsuo, also known as Hiro Matsun



 "Complete version of science fiction, the identity of thermodynamic entropy"

 Hiro Matsun Koichi Matsuo

 Preface

 In May 2020, I announced for the first time on this occasion, "Science Novel: The Identity of Thermodynamic Entropy", which is now in the form of the latest version, available from Amazon as a kindle edition book and paper It was announced as a back version, and now it is possible to read it for free, so I think there are quite a few people who actually read it.

 This work was written by myself, covering all the content that I had researched over the past 14 years of my life.

 Therefore, I understand that there are many criticisms and questions about the content of this work, but it was a work that did not receive any of these from anyone.

 However, although I myself assert that the results of my research are undeniably true, unless there is any criticism or questioning, the results of my research will I don't think I can fully prove that this is true.

 Therefore, in this work, I would like to write while properly proving that what I have announced is true.

 By all means, through this work, I would like to explain it as easily as possible to those who want to gain knowledge about thermodynamic entropy.





 Chapter 1 What exactly is thermodynamic entropy?

 　Thermodynamic entropy is a thermodynamic quantity proposed by the German physicist Clausius in the mid-19th century.

 　　　　　　　　ΔS=ΔQ/T

 , and is a quantity that expresses the degree of disorder, disorder, and irregularity of a system. It has been said that entropy does not decrease in a system with no material or heat transfer, but always increases when it undergoes an irreversible change. .

 However, I wonder what happens when the absolute temperature T on the right side of the definition of thermodynamic entropy approaches zero, that is, when the absolute temperature T takes a limit value close to zero?  From the fact that the entropy becomes infinite in that case, I succeeded in identifying the identity of negative thermodynamic entropy, which had been a very difficult question until now.

 Here, I will state the conclusion first, but the identity of the negative thermodynamic entropy that I discovered is that when an electric current flows through an electric wire, it always generates heat and magnetic force (attractive force) due to the magnetic field. It is a phenomenon.  The reason why the natural phenomenon occurs is that it is a natural phenomenon that manifests negative thermodynamic entropy itself. I will have discovered that.

 And from this fact, it can be understood that the energy generated by the substance itself is generated due to the state quantity of entropy that the substance has, so the heat quantity Q can also be expressed as SK [entropy Kelvin] , I also mentioned that the quantity of heat Q itself can be said to be a quantity of state.

 This is because, until now, it has been said that the quantity of heat Q is not a quantity of state because it depends on the path through which the quantity of heat is generated. , the quantity of heat Q is not generated depending on the path. 　　

 I wrote this fact on Wikipedia, but after being repeatedly deleted by a person who claimed to be an editorial board member of Wikipedia, I was personally attacked for an incomprehensible and groundless crime, and I was completely kicked out. rice field.

 In the completely closed world of Wikipedia, I think that no matter how much we discussed it, it would have been meaningless.

 Although Wikipedia claims to be a "web encyclopedia that anyone can edit", I swear that it is just a fake web encyclopedia that cannot be trusted at all.


 Here, I would like to add the mathematical basis that the quantity of heat Q is a quantity of state.

 From ΔS = ΔQ/T,

 　　ΔQ = ΔS T

 Here, if we integrate both sides

 　　∴ Q = S T

 In other words, the quantity of heat Q is represented by SK [entropy Kelvin], but both entropy and absolute temperature are state quantities, so the product S×T can also be said to be a state quantity.  In other words, the quantity of heat Q can be said to be a quantity of state.

 Next, I stated in my previous work that thermodynamic entropy is a quantity of state caused by the internal energy U of a substance. I want to continue

 There are various definitions of the internal energy U of a substance, but in this case, “Internal energy U is the driving force that can be physical work of a substance, that is, energy. , the unit is J (joule).”

 Here, thermodynamic entropy can be regarded as the value obtained by dividing the internal energy of a substance by the absolute temperature K (Kelvin).


 In my previous work, I came to define the entropy in this case as internal entropy.

 　ΔS = ΔU/T

 It's about.

 In other words, I thought that the entropy of the internal energy U divided by the absolute temperature must be clearly distinguished from the entropy of the heat quantity Q divided by the absolute temperature. I defined it because it is based on the fact that the negative thermodynamic entropy caused by the internal energy of a substance is divided into magnetic force (attractive force) due to heat and magnetic field. Met.

 However, what is the basis of the amount of heat Q generated in the manifestation of negative thermodynamic entropy and the magnetic force (attractive force) due to the magnetic field? Considering that, it can be judged that this distinction is not necessary because it is the energy that is generated based on the internal energy of the substance.

 In other words, it can be said that both the quantity of heat Q and the thermodynamic entropy S are state quantities generated due to the internal energy U of matter.

 And thermodynamic entropy is nothing but the amount of change in the internal energy of a changing substance in a certain absolute temperature environment.

 In other words, the conclusion is drawn that thermodynamic entropy is a state quantity that represents the amount of change in the internal energy of a substance that can change in a certain absolute temperature environment.

 "In other words, what exactly is thermodynamic entropy?" It can be said that the answer represents the amount of energy that can be obtained by changing the internal energy of a substance in a certain absolute temperature environment.

 Based on these, thermodynamic entropy is considered to be the energy that can be obtained from the internal energy of a substance in a certain absolute temperature environment, that is, the state quantity that expresses the energy efficiency of internal energy. I also mentioned in my previous work that there are two ways to express entropy.

 One is the phenomenon in which magnetic force (attractive force) is generated due to heat and magnetic field when an electric current flows through an electric wire. I think I have mentioned that two phenomena occur, one of which is the phenomenon that produces negative pressure.

 And I think that the appearance of thermodynamic entropy in these two cases means that the appearance form of entropy can also change depending on the difference in the state of matter (gas, liquid, solid).

 For example, I think that it is nothing but that ``The form of thermodynamic entropy that can be expressed in a solid substance such as a metal is different from that in a gaseous substance such as water vapor.'' , For example, even with the same metal, I think that the form of entropy expression will be different between iron and tungsten.  It can be said that iron more easily develops magnetic force (attractive force) due to heat and a magnetic field, and that the generation of heat is the main manifestation of entropy in tungsten.

 In other words, it can be said that the expression form of thermodynamic entropy also changes depending on the state and physical properties of the substance.

 And, depending on the state of matter, the form of entropy expression changes, which means that the form of work that can be done by the energy of entropy also changes.

 That is, energy is the power that can do physical work, and since energy and work have a cause and effect relationship, they can be considered to be equivalent in terms of energy.

 In other words, if all energy is a state quantity, work itself can also be said to be a state quantity.

 For example, it can be said that the amount of heat is generated due to the entropy of matter, and it is not generated depending on the path. , the work that can be done by heat itself is also a quantity of state.  For this reason it is well proved that the unit of heat and the unit of work are equal.

 Also, until now, it has been said that physical work itself is not a state quantity because its path is related. Physical work itself can be said to be a state quantity.

 And since energy is the basis and physical work can occur, it can be said that the relationship is that of cause and effect.

 However, energy is not work.  For energy is the cause and work is the effect, but it follows that we can say that their magnitudes are equal.

 In other words, the relationship is 

　Ι energy Ι = Ι work Ι.

 In other words, the state quantity is not related to the path, but refers to the physical quantity that can be said to be a state quantity if it represents the state of matter and has a relationship where the absolute values ​​are always equal.

 And this fact can lead to the fact that the unit of energy and the unit of work are never contradicted, and that the law of conservation of energy can also be proved.

 However, I think one question arises here.

 It is the source of the heat quantity Q, but is it necessary to distinguish between the heat quantity generated by the internal energy of the substance and the heat quantity generated by the kinetic energy and potential energy of the substance?  This is the question.

 In order to solve the question, how is the amount of heat generated by the kinetic energy and potential energy of the material?  It will be necessary to think carefully about that.

 For example, the phenomenon of friction caused by the motion of matter produces a very large amount of heat, and it can be assumed that the amount of heat generated by friction is the amount of heat generated by the kinetic energy when substances rub against each other.

 It is necessary to think about where the kinetic energy that forms the basis of this frictional energy came from.  For example, consider the amount of heat generated by friction caused by piston movement in an internal combustion engine.

 In this case, the source of kinetic energy is the kinetic energy obtained by converting it into kinetic energy based on the power and heat generated by the combustion explosion of gaseous substances.

 In other words, I think that it is the amount of heat generated by the friction caused by the kinetic energy generated by the combustion explosion of the gas substance.

 In other words, the energy on which the kinetic energy is based is the internal energy of the gas substance.

 In other words, I think that the source of the heat quantity Q in this case can be judged to be the energy from the internal energy of the substance.

 In other words, in any case, it is better to think that the source of heat generation is the internal energy of the substance.

 "Let me give you another example."

 This is the case where humans use human power to rotate the screw in the water tank and bring in the amount of heat.

 "In this case, what is the source of human power?"  I think it is necessary to consider that, but in this case as well, in order for humans to exercise, it is essential to take in sugar and oil, water, minerals, vitamins, etc. from food.

 In other words, even in the case of human power, if we trace its roots, we will end up with matter.  In other words, it is thought that all energy ends up in the internal energy of matter.

 In other words, there are many sources of energy for the heat quantity Q, but the source of all energy is the internal energy of matter. As far as the content goes, I think you're right.

 What I have explained so far is a fact derived from my thermodynamic entropy research results. What does thermodynamic entropy represent? I have actually found the answer to this question from the results of my research, and I will try to summarize it here again.

 I have found that negative thermodynamic entropy is a real quantity of state.

 In other words, my discovery identified that thermodynamic entropy is a real quantity of state, but until now it was said that negative thermodynamic entropy represents an impossible state.

 However, I believe that negative thermodynamic entropy represents the natural phenomenon that whenever an electric current flows through an electric wire, heat is generated and at the same time magnetic force (attraction) is generated by the magnetic field. We have discovered that the implied entropy is a state quantity that actually exists.

 In other words, I have discovered the mechanism that causes this natural phenomenon, which is the origin of the natural phenomenon in which heat is always generated when an electric current flows through an electric wire, and at the same time, magnetic force (attractive force) is generated by a magnetic field. I have discovered that what is happening is negative thermodynamic entropy.

 And that fact is a fact that can be properly understood that thermodynamic entropy is the basis of heat generation.

 And he also proved it mathematically.

 The proof is the definition of thermodynamic entropy

　　　　ΔS = ΔQ / T (In this case, the absolute temperature T is constant) 　From this formula, 　　　　

              ΔQ=ΔS T

 It can be expressed as. Integrating this expression gives 　　　

               Q=ST

 Therefore, the right side of this equation is expressed in entropy Kelvin [SK]. In other words, the amount of heat is also expressed in terms of entropy Kelvin, and the product of entropy and absolute temperature represents the amount of heat. It also expresses one thing.

 That certain temperature environment is absolute zero. In other words, at absolute zero, the only energy generated due to entropy is heat.

 This is because, at absolute zero, no magnetic force (attractive force) is generated by the magnetic field generated at the same time as the amount of heat. The reason for this is that at absolute zero, the vibration of matter ceases, and there is no resistance to the flow of electrons, so there is no friction between electrons. 　

 In other words, in this case, the appearance of negative entropy is

              Q=-S

 "It will be." This is because absolute zero is the state that is completely unaffected by absolute temperature.

 And since the result of this formula is based on the law of conservation of energy, it can be said to be correct.

 Also, from this result, it can be understood that the current flows due to the entropy of the material, and the kinetic energy of the electron flow becomes the amount of heat.

 In other words, it can be inferred from this result that the electromotive force V is based on the thermodynamic entropy of the substance.

 In other words, from that fact, we can properly understand that the amount of heat Q is generated based on the state quantity of thermodynamic entropy that the substance has. And from this fact, the quantity of heat Q itself is also a quantity of state.

 If you don't understand my explanation so far, I would like you to read this first chapter again properly, but I didn't use magic and I didn't lie at all. So this is a fact.

 Until now, it has been said that the amount of heat is not a quantity of state, but I intend to state the fact on this occasion to overturn this. If there is no objection here, let's move on to the next step.

 If you have any objections to my explanation so far, please feel free to leave a comment in the comments section.

 Thank you.