data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fec76/fec76a3ba25bdc6b82015d6fb79db82427ea6c71" alt="見出し画像"
基本スクリプト⑮ー通信の監視、検閲
こちらも頻出テーマです。一定程度は必要だけど、行き過ぎはいけないよね、という論調が説明しやすいです。この場合は「in a certain level(一定程度は)」や「Excessive ---(過度の)」という表現が便利です。
国家は個人の通信を監視する権限をもつべきか。→一定程度は持つ必要有る
1.過度な通信の監視は監視者社会をもたらす→人権侵害
2.しかし、テロや犯罪の予防のために一定程度必要。
3.法的枠組みが大事
Q: Should the government have the authority to monitor private communications to ensure national security? Why or why not?
Answer:
I think government have the authority to monitor private communications to ensure national security in a certain level.
Excessive surveillance of communications can lead to a surveillance society, as seen in China. For example, WeChat and TikTok are popular communication tools among Chinese citizens. However, if someone posts government-critical information, their account can be deleted, or in the worst case, they may be imprisoned. This kind of excessive monitoring violates the civilians' freedom of speech and should not be accepted.
On the other hand, government surveillance is effective in preventing terrorism and crime. In recent years, drug dealing, terrorism, fraud, and robbery are conducted through social media platforms. Monitoring those communications to prevent these crimes should be accepted to ensure our safety and security. However, it is essential to have a legal framework and careful procedures, such as obtaining court approval.